CPSC asks for responses on a series of questions addressing direct notice and other forms of consumer recall notification
This notice below is directed at those companies who conduct recalls. The CPSC is trying to increase recall effectiveness (versus press releases and media notices which are for the most part not very good at reaching the affected consumers). Of course the best way to do that is to have consumers register with brands or their distributors so that if or when a product is ever recalled they can receive direct notice. The problem of course is ensuring that this data remains current over some uncertain time frame. That is a huge task and its not clear at this point whose job it is to do that. Also there could be lots of added or assumed responsibility on the recalling party to preserve this date for an indefinite period of time and to safeguard it like credit card data. As most of you know in states like California (and a few other states) product registration cannot be required in order to receive a full product warranty. Obviously some huge hurdles here. To comment before September 5, 2018 visit this link.
AGENCY:
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.
ACTION:
Notice of request for information.
SUMMARY:
To advance the concepts
discussed during the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission's (CPSC)
Recall Effectiveness Workshop in 2017, the CPSC announces a Request for
Information (RFI) from stakeholders to provide information critical to
future work on Recall Effectiveness. CPSC asks for responses on a series
of questions addressing direct notice and other forms of customer
notice. The information provided will help inform CPSC's efforts to
continue improving the effectiveness of recalls.
DATES:
Submit comments by September 5, 2018.
ADDRESSES:
You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CPSC-2017-0027, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit electronic comments to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at: www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. The Commission does
not accept comments submitted by electronic mail (email), except through
www.regulations.gov.
The Commission encourages you to submit electronic comments by using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal, as described above; however, please do
not use this method if you are submitting confidential business
information or other sensitive information that should not be made
public.
Written Submissions: Submit written submissions by
mail/hand delivery/courier to: Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product
Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD
20814; telephone (301) 504-7923.
Instructions: All submissions received must include
the agency name and docket number for this notice. All comments
received may be posted without change, including any personal
identifiers, contact information, or other personal information
provided, to: www.regulations.gov.
If you submit confidential business information, trade secret
information, or other sensitive or protected information that you do not
want to be available to the public, do not submit it electronically,
but send it in hard copy to the Office of the Secretary at the address
indicated above. See also section III, below.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to: www.regulations.gov, and insert the docket number CPSC-2017-0027, into the “Search” box, and follow the prompts.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph F. Williams, Compliance
Officer, the Office of Compliance and Field Operations, U.S. Consumer
Product Safety Commission, 4330 East-West Hwy., Bethesda, MD 20814;
telephone: 301-504-7585; email: jfwilliams@cpsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Recall Effectiveness Workshop
On July 25, 2017, the
CPSC hosted a Recall Effectiveness Workshop. The goal of the workshop
was to explore and develop proactive measures that CPSC and stakeholders
can undertake to improve recall effectiveness. Seventy-nine external
stakeholders attended the workshop, including various retailers,
manufacturers, law firms, consumer interest groups, third party recall
contractors and consultants, testing laboratories, and other interested
parties. CPSC staff facilitated an open discussion among these
participants about ways to increase recall effectiveness and also
gathered feedback on how CPSC can potentially improve its recall
efforts. Additional details may be found here: https://www.cpsc.gov/Recall-Effectiveness.
B. Recall Effectiveness Report
Following the workshop, CPSC
staff prepared a report, which was released on February 22, 2018. The
report stated that the CPSC staff intends to prioritize stakeholders'
suggestions to:
- Collaborate on ways to improve direct notice to consumers; and
- collaborate with firms to explore how technology can be used to enhance recall response.
The report explained the reason for this focus:
“Direct notice recalls have proven to be the most
effective recalls. We intend to work with consumer and industry
stakeholders on registration methods or other improvements (e.g.,
retailer opt-in at checkout, home voice assistants, photo texting, QR
codes, and incentives for product registration) to promote direct notice
recalls.”
“We will continue to explore how technology can be used to
enhance recall response in appropriate cases, including enhancing
firms' recall marketing strategies, use of social media, and improved
methods for in-store communication. We intend to identify and share
examples of future recall marketing strategies that are innovative
and/or successful.”
The full Recall Effectiveness Report may be found here: https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/Recall_Effectiveness_Workshop_Report-2018.pdf?R1VyLltrl8M_id.2vkAklHoUZjaSCab.Start Printed Page 29103
II. Information Requested
The CPSC seeks information on
current methods and systems that recalling firms use to assist in
providing direct notice to consumers. The CPSC also requests certain
information regarding the use of targeted notices to reach consumers who
may have purchased a recalled product.
A. Direct Notice
1. What methods are available for directly notifying consumers of recalls (e.g., mail, email, text)?
2. If you use direct notice for
recalls, what response rates do you achieve? Do the response rates
differ significantly for different recalls? If so, what factors appear
to influence the response rates? Do you follow up with additional direct
notice if a customer does not respond? How often? For how long?
3. Do other companies or your company use all available direct notice methods during every product recall? If not, why not?
4. Do e-commerce
retailers/third party platforms use direct notice capabilities for every
recall of products sold through their site/platform? If not, why not?
5. What costs are
associated with direct notice? How do costs vary for different forms of
notice? What other factors affect cost?
6. What challenges and barriers prevent companies from pursuing or improving direct notice? Please address:
a. Legal barriers
b. Technological challenges
c. Privacy challenges
d. Security challenges
e. Cost challenges
f. Other challenges
7. What technologies exist or are
being developed that would assist a recalling company to acquire direct
contact information or capabilities to contact purchasers and/or issue
direct notice for recalls?
8. What methods do you use to collect direct contact information at the point of sale?
9. Does your attempt to collect
direct contact information depend on the item(s) purchased? Is the cost
of the item at all relevant?
10. Have you worked with a third-party entity (e.g.,
credit card or payment processing companies, product registries, data
collection platforms, online retailers) to identify or contact consumers
who previously purchased a product subject to a recall? If so, how, and
with what types of companies did you work?
11. For retailers that have information on their customers (e.g.,
retail credit/debit cards, loyalty program, membership registration),
can such information be accessed through purchase data to provide direct
notice?
12. What would make direct notice more effective (e.g., notice type, number of touches)?
13. How can the CPSC help facilitate direct notice to consumers?
14. What can we learn from marketing efforts (e.g.,
needed resources, personnel qualifications, channels of communication,
evaluating messaging effectiveness, etc.) to better reach consumers for
recall purposes?
B. Product Registration
1. What product registration methods are used today to collect consumer information and track purchased/registered products?
2. Why do companies
offer product registration? Are product registration programs due to
mandatory requirements by CPSC or other agencies, or for other reasons?
3. What are participation rates
in product registration? Do you see significant differences in the
registration rates for different types of products?
4. What type of information is collected during product registration?
5. Is product registration more or less successful if marketing information is not collected at the same time? Why?
6. What methods are in use or are being developed to increase responses to product registration (e.g., warranties, incentives, voice assistant technology)?
7. When does the personal information collected for product registration get used for marketing purposes?
a. Are opt-in/opt-out choices provided to consumers for marketing? Describe.
8. What technologies exist or are being developed to advance product registration?
9. What would make product registration more effective?
10. How can the CPSC help facilitate or improve product registration rates?
11. Has the ability to
register a product online or electronically had an effect on the volume
of consumer response to product registration?
C. Targeted Notice
A targeted notice is a
notice aimed at a particular group of likely affected consumers, but not
at a known purchaser or consumer like direct notice (e.g.,
targeted search engine ads, paid social media, micro marketing, such as
internet radio and targeted use of voice assistant technologies).
1. Have you used any of the targeted methods listed above or others to reach consumers? What success have you seen?
2. Do companies use the information previously collected to assist in issuing targeted recall notices when announcing recalls?
3. What costs are
generally associated with targeted methods, including targeted search
engine ads, paid social media, micro marketing, such as internet radio,
and voice assistant technologies?
4. What challenges and barriers prevent companies from pursuing targeted notices for recalls? Please address:
a. Legal barriers
b. Technological challenges
c. Privacy challenges
d. Security challenges
e. Cost challenges
f. Other challenges
5. What technologies exist or are being developed that can improve the effectiveness of targeted notice?
6. How can the CPSC help facilitate new or improved targeted recall notice campaigns?
7. Are there other forms of recall notice that are worth exploring for more discussion?
D. For Consumers and Other Stakeholders
1. Would you be
interested in working directly with the CPSC to explore best practices
for implementing product registration, improving current direct notice
capabilities, or developing targeted notices?
2. Are there data
showing what forms, types, and frequency of messaging consumers are most
likely to respond to in direct and targeted notices?
3. How can companies
incentivize consumers to register their products or to provide the
information needed for direct notice in the event of a recall?
4. What concerns do
consumers have regarding the use of their personal information for
recall notification purposes? What can firms do to overcome these
concerns?
III. Confidentiality
All data submitted is
subject to Section 6 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C.
Section 2055) and may be considered confidential, except to the extent
otherwise provided by law. Please identify any portion of your
submission that you believe is confidential.
Alberta E. Mills,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-13388 Filed 6-21-18; 8:45 am]
